Current news #11: Update submission rejected

Apple has rejected our first submission of the iKeePass update version 1.1 due the use of one so called non public function. This function is shown in many sample around the net and in many books. So if you are a iPhone developer, be careful what you use.
We will change these function calls and try again.

108 Responses to “Current news #11: Update submission rejected”

  1. Dave says:

    Is that the same jbiKeePass that sends your passwords to an unknown third party?

    Just kidding – I don’t know this for a fact; however the point is how do you know it doesn’t?

  2. krikkit says:

    @Dave: and how do you know that the normal iKeepass does not send your password to unknown third party? …you never know that if you don’t compile the application yourself and inspect the sourcecode before…

  3. Mark says:

    Hi karsten. Could you give us any idea when this be available in the UK? Thank you.

  4. rambuster says:

    karsten, did you eventually read about the relaxed and improved procedures for approving apps over at apple?

    Any chance you would give it another shot as some folks report about several api calls not being a drawback any more?

  5. Jürg says:

    Ja ich bin nun auch auf mSecure umgestiegen. Perfekte Software, läuft und ist vor allem auf der ganzen Welt einsetzbar ohne Jailbreak.

    Schade das ich von Keepass abschied nehmen musste. Aber über 1 Jahr auf die Iphone lösung zu warten kann es einfach nicht sein…

  6. karsten says:

    @Dave: strange humor. You have to trust our word, or go the hard way and build your own iKeePass. The sources are available at github, but you need a Apple Developer Licence and create your own provisions.

  7. [...] like Locale could never make it on to the iPhone. Using Apples own internal private API can also land you in trouble, without you even knowing about [...]

Leave a Reply